Loading...
Backed By Bosch
Use this AI to optimize manufacturing automation and integration for Bosch Rexroth ctrlX users.
ctrlX AUTOMATION by Bosch Rexroth is an open, modular automation platform designed for Industry 4.0. It enables seamless integration of machines, devices, and IT systems, supporting AI-driven analytics, cloud connectivity, and flexible automation. The platform’s app-based architecture allows users to deploy, scale, and customize automation solutions, driving efficiency, quality, and digital transformation in manufacturing.
App-based automation
Modular and scalable
Data-driven process optimization
Predictive maintenance
Integrates with IT, OT, and IoT systems
Cloud and edge support
Supports various hardware and devices
Customizable workflows
Open APIs for third-party apps
Marketplace for automation solutions
IEC 61131 PLC runtime
IEC 61131 PLC runtime
ctrlX COREplus X3 controller
ctrlX CORE control platform (ultra-compact)
ctrlX OS (real-time Linux operating system)
App-based functional extensions via ctrlX Store
Web-based engineering (minimal software installation)
Support for all major programming languages
Real user experiences from across different platforms
I'm the principle EE at my branch... we were able to build a like for like system for 1/3rd the cost. I didn't find it difficult to make the change, it's open source, that's the best part.
skankhunt4204
2y ago
ware openness and flexibility
actices (e.g., Python, virtualization) into OT/control systems
plified, or legacy control environment (e.g., classic Windows-based engineering)
ills to leverage the open platform's full potential
Reduces total component and engineering effort by 30% to 50% through component consolidation (e.g., all functions on one OS/controller) and massive software openness/flexibility, ensuring a future-proof architecture for Industry 4.0 applications (AI, 5G, TSN).
Reported steep learning curve and initial implementation struggles Documentation is sometimes perceived as unfinished or hard to access by users Lack of strong out-of-the-box native simulation capabilities (compared to competitors like Siemens) Weaker low/no-code tooling compared to market leaders Inconsistency in supporting different fieldbus protocols (e.g., EtherCAT CoE support was initially missing/delayed)