Backed By Snyk
An AI-powered security platform for developers.
Snyk is an AI-powered developer security platform that provides visibility, context, and control over application risk. It integrates security into development workflows to help identify and remediate vulnerabilities early.
Identify vulnerabilities in code during development.
Reduce risk of security breaches.
Receive recommendations for fixing vulnerabilities.
Streamline the remediation process.
Embed security checks into existing development workflows.
Shift-left security practices.
Understand and prioritize vulnerabilities based on severity and impact.
Focus on the most critical risks.
Leverage AI to gain deeper context on vulnerabilities.
Receive intelligent recommendations.
Meet security compliance requirements.
Simplify audit processes.
Unlimited contributing developers
Minimum of 5 contributing developers (up to 10)
Range of testing across SDLC
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) for open-source dependencies and licenses
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for proprietary code (Snyk Code)
Container Security scanning and base image remediation
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) security scanning (Terraform, Kubernetes, CloudFormation, etc.)
Real-time scanning and in-workflow security checks (IDE, PRs)
Real user experiences from across different platforms
Its Scanning capabilities are very Good. For instance, it really does well in SAST scans and even SCA scans. It is also helpful in mitigating vulnerabilities by providing the best solutions. What I dislike is its cost. It is very expensive.
Verified User
Aug 9, 2025
SecOps culture.
ud-native stack (code, dependencies, containers, IaC).
rehensive security for all products (due to high cost).
ound support for mission-critical bugs (due to reported support issues).
Empowering developers to build secure applications, by providing real-time, actionable security feedback and automated fixes directly within their existing tools and workflows, thus reducing security debt and accelerating secure software delivery.
Can be expensive, especially for smaller teams or to consolidate all products. Customer support can be slow and unhelpful, with reported difficulty in escalating bugs/feature requests. Potential for a high volume of false positives and alert overload in older/complex codebases. Requires manual repository import (no auto-import for new repos without external script/configuration). CLI may not provide all information available in the UI (e.g., for SBOM data).